Book Alchemy

Book Alchemy

Share this post

Book Alchemy
Book Alchemy
How far have we come?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

How far have we come?

Four centuries of women barely permitted to make art

Caroline Donahue's avatar
Caroline Donahue
Sep 10, 2024
∙ Paid
29

Share this post

Book Alchemy
Book Alchemy
How far have we come?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4
4
Share
image: Gwen John Self Portrait, 1902. Acquired by the Tate, 1942.

Permission is a tricky beast.

I’m in London this week and spent Sunday in the Tate Britain in “Now You See Us: Women Artists in Britain, 1520-1920.” It’s a large show, with many artists represented, and I spent a solid hour poring over it.

However, as is often the case in shows about women’s options throughout history, I was absolutely boiling by the end.

“With her husband’s support…”

Since I have a degree in Art History, I am guilty of going through shows without reading the commentary or labels, but this time I dug in and read them all. The stories of the artists felt as important as the art, and nearly every story hinged on the artist receiving permission from a man in order to make art.

Given that the end of the show featured work from just over a century ago, we have barely moved out of the period when a woman could be barred from expressing herself creatively simply because her husband didn’t like it. The array of stupid objections was staggering.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Caroline Donahue
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More