Book (& Craft) Alchemy

Book (& Craft) Alchemy

Share this post

Book (& Craft) Alchemy
Book (& Craft) Alchemy
How far have we come?

How far have we come?

Four centuries of women barely permitted to make art

Caroline Donahue's avatar
Caroline Donahue
Sep 10, 2024
∙ Paid
29

Share this post

Book (& Craft) Alchemy
Book (& Craft) Alchemy
How far have we come?
4
4
Share
image: Gwen John Self Portrait, 1902. Acquired by the Tate, 1942.

Permission is a tricky beast.

I’m in London this week and spent Sunday in the Tate Britain in “Now You See Us: Women Artists in Britain, 1520-1920.” It’s a large show, with many artists represented, and I spent a solid hour poring over it.

However, as is often the case in shows about women’s options throughout history, I was absolutely boiling by the end.

“With her husband’s support…”

Since I have a degree in Art History, I am guilty of going through shows without reading the commentary or labels, but this time I dug in and read them all. The stories of the artists felt as important as the art, and nearly every story hinged on the artist receiving permission from a man in order to make art.

Given that the end of the show featured work from just over a century ago, we have barely moved out of the period when a woman could be barred from expressing herself creatively simply because her husband didn’t like it. The array of stupid objections was staggering.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Caroline Donahue
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share